R Packaging: All in One View

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Overview

Questions

“What is an R package?”
“Why do we want an R package?”

Objectives

“Understand what an R package is”
“Understand why a package is useful”
“Understand the tools you are about to use”

Picture yourself starting a new programming project. Most likely, your first step will consist of creating a new folder, a folder that you will later populate with files. If the project is long and complex, you will need several files and also some subfolders. The folder structure can eventually become pretty complex and difficult to maintain, especially if your project has multiple authors.

Wait a moment! Long and complex projects, multiple authors… this sounds like any scientific project! Is there a way of making this process easier? The answer is yes, and the way is by structuring our work as a software package.

What is a package and what is it good for?

A package may sound complex, but it is simply a standard way of structuring your project. This standardized structure applies to the files and (sub)folders of your project, but also to your code: in an R package, the code consists of functions only. These will be the access points for anyone who wants to use your code.

Structuring our projects as packages has several advantages, such as increased:

Robustness
Reproducibility
Shareability
Legibility
Usability
Maintainability

A thought about standards

Standards are more valuable that you may think.

The fact that we are teaching this course in English, for instance, rests on the assumption that you can read English. None of the authors of this guide has English as their mother tongue. Using English was a choice, aimed at maximizing the number of people able to read this guide. And all of this rests on the fact that English is, nowadays, the standard language of science.

Something similar happens with R packages. Structuring your R projects as an R package is a way of making them available to a huge pool of people who “speak” R. And the communication goes both ways. Other developers or collaborators can use your software easier, but you can also use theirs.

Indeed, most likely you are already part of this “conversation”. Did you ever use a library (such as knitr, lubridate or stringi)? If the answer is yes, you are already using packages. Packages written by someone else.

In this lesson we will show you how to write your own, so you can actively participate in the R community.

How can this course help me?

As we will see during this course, applying a standardized structure comes with several unexpected benefits. Let me ask you a few questions:

Did you ever have problems running a script written by a colleague?
Did you ever have problems running your own code?
Are you sometimes scared of editing your code, just in case you “break” it?
Did you ever have to re-do all the figures in your paper manually?
Do you suspect that some parts of your code may not be working as you want them to?
Do you feel that you are losing control about how your code is growing?

If your answer to any of the previous questions is yes, stay with us. You may not know it yet, but software packaging can make your life easier.

Can anyone give an example of these things happening to them in their work?

Prerequisites

Have you ever written an R function? If the answer is yes, then you are ready to take this course. If the answer is no, we recommend you read this episode of the Programming with R course.

Why R?

The practice of software packaging is applicable to many programming languages. The language of choice for this course is R. Is there any reason for that?

As we will see, R projects are particularly easy to be written in the form of packages. This makes R the ideal language for getting started with packaging.

Why RStudio?

RStudio is an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) specifically designed for R. As many IDEs, it contains some menus and buttons arranged in an intuitive interface. This will relieve a lot of mental space, as we do not have to remember the commands for common operations such as building, saving, knitting and so on. In this course we will make extensive use of it.

Pro-tip

When you hover over a button in RStudio, a textbox will be displayed. Among other things, this textbox will contain the equivalent key combination (for instance, Ctrl/Cmd + S for saving). Paying attention to these text boxes is a perfect way of getting used to, and ultimately remembering by heart, those key combinations.

Additionally, after pressing a button, some commands will be executed in the console.

It is always very instructive to take a look at what commands the button triggered.

Key Points

“An R package is a project in a standardized folder structure”
“An R package centers around R functions”
“RStudio is a useful editor that helps you package your project”

Content from Accessing packages

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Overview

Questions

How do I use someone else’s package?
How do I use my own package?
What is the difference between installing and attaching?

Objectives

Install and attach packages from CRAN
Install and attach packages from Gitlab
Build, install and attach your own packages

One of the advantages of packages is that they can be installed. This allows us to use the functions contained in the package from anywhere.

There are many ways of accessing a package in order to start using it. In this section, we will look at the most common ones. It’s very likely that you already know at least one of these methods if you are a regular R user.

At the end of this episode, we’ll describe briefly some alternatives that may be useful in some cases.

Install a package from CRAN

CRAN is the official repository for R Packages. It stands for the Comprehensive R Archive Network. It is an awesome collection of high quality resources written by other R users just like you.

Installing a package from CRAN is particularly easy. Let’s imagine we need to install a package with tools for R developers. We can start by browsing to our favorite search engine, and make a search like: R developers tools. Almost certainly it will point us to a package called devtools. This package contains, among other things, functions to easily install from sources other than CRAN. It will be useful in the next section. The package can be installed by opening RStudio and browsing to the Packages tab:

After pressing Install, a window like this will appear:

We write devtools in the prompt, and press install. This operation will download and install the package and the required dependencies. Depending on the package, it may take a while, ranging from a few seconds to a few minutes.

The same, but with a command

Some people may prefer using code instead of a graphical user interface to install a package. Are you one of them? Then, you’ll like to know that all the above is equivalent to typing:

R

install.packages("devtools")

As often happens with RStudio, you don’t have to remember this command by heart. You can keep using the graphical user interface and observe what happens in the console. RStudio will build and execute the command for you.

After installing, the new package should appear in the Packages tab.

Something went wrong?

Sometimes, an installation may fail. If that’s the case, take a look at the output message in the console. It will contain very useful information, and direct suggestions about how to fix the problem.

Can I publish my package in CRAN?

The answer is yes, and it is easier than you may think. Most developers of CRAN packages are R users just like you and me. If you have a package you are proud of, and you think it may be useful for someone else, consider submitting it.

In the sections below we’ll see how to install a package from other sources than CRAN. But first, let’s see how can we actually use our freshly installed package!

Using an installed package

If you have used packages before, you may know that installing the package is not enough to start using it immediately. In order to use an installed package, you need to load it into workspace. In R jargon this is known as attaching the package. This means that its functions and data will become available in your working session, so you can use them in your console and your scripts. Additionally, the functions in your package will be added to the search path.

The easiest way to attach an installed package is by using the Packages tab. If you click on the package’s name, the package’s help menu will open. If you click on the checkbox by the package’s name (see figure below), the package will be attached.

The figure above shows that the package testthat is installed and attached. Other packages, such as stringi, stringr or svglite, are installed but not attached.

What if we want to attach a package from the console?

How would you attach an installed R package using the console?

Tip: As always with RStudio, it is a good idea to look at the console while we are performing operations in the graphical user interface.

Show me the solution

Use library(<package name>)

Using a function without attaching the package

In some situations it can be a good idea to load individual functions from a given package, but not the package itself. This can be done using the syntax: <package>::<function>.

For instance, if we want to use the function filter from the package dplyr we can call it directly as:

R

dplyr::filter()

Keep in mind that for this to work, dplyr has to be installed.

To attach or not to attach?

If you are developing a package that depends on other packages, you’ll need to call functions from other packages. These functions will be used in the functions of your own package. When you do this, it is strongly recommended to call functions from the other packages using the syntax <package>::<function>. Conversely, it is strongly advised to not use library(<package>) inside a package.

Do you have any idea why?

Show me the solution

The dependencies of a package can become tricky. A common problem is that two packages may contain two functions with the same name. The more explicit the naming, the better.

Additionally, we have to keep our potential users in mind. We want our package to do its work and leave no trace behind. Using library(<package>) inside the package will attach the package without you realizing. And when you’re finished with your function, the package will still be attached.

We’ll learn more about packages that depend on other packages in the episode Dependencies).

Install a package from GitHub

Although CRAN is the official repository for R packages, it is not the only one you can use. A very interesting alternative is GitHub, the most popular open code repository. We can use GitHub to find packages or to make our own packages publicly available. Contrary to CRAN, packages in GitHub are not reviewed. This has an advantage: you can have your package published there immediately.

Find a package on github, bitbucket, or gitlab and install it with devtools

If you have trouble finding a package, try github.com/PabRod/kinematics.

If you know how to install from GitHub already, try a package from GitLab. For instance, try gitlab.com/r-packages/psyverse.

Show me the solution

devtools::install_github("PabRod/kinematics")
devtools::install_gitlab("r-packages/psyverse")

# or

devtools::install_git("https://gitlab.com/r-packages/psyverse")

Learning how to publish your package on GitHub is out of the scope of the present course. But, if you are interested, we encourage you to take the course on Version control with Git and GitHub (note this supplemental on Git with Rstudio), and this lesson chapter on Collaborating via Github).

Why would you want to install a package from GitHub?

Can you think of a situation where you’ll rather install from GitHub than from CRAN?

Show me the solution

There are two common situations where you’ll want to use GitHub instead of CRAN:

The first and most obvious one is when the package you want doesn’t exist on CRAN. This can happen for many reasons. Maybe the package is still work in progress, or doesn’t pass the CRAN quality checklist. Or perhaps the authors just don’t want to publish it on CRAN.

The second situation is when you need a cutting edge version of the package. R developers usually use GitHub for their everyday work, and only apply to CRAN when they have accumulated changes enough. If you need a very particular version of the package, usually GitHub is the place to go.

Install a package from source

What if the package is only available in your computer? This is the case of the one we are building during this lesson.

The easiest way to install a package from source is by opening the package project and using the Build tab:

By pressing Install and restart three things will happen:

The package will be, indeed, installed.
The R session will be restarted.
The package will be attached.

Why would you want to load a package from source

Can you think of a situation where you’ll need to install and attach a package from source?

Show me the solution

The most common situation is while you are developing a package. Every now and then, you’ll want to re-install and re-attach it to check that everything is working as expected.

A short glossary

It is useful to keep in mind these three concepts:

Build: converts a local package into an installable package.
Install: adds the package to your local library, so it is ready to be attached when desired.
Attach: loads the package’s functions to your workspace, making them ready to be used.

When you press Install and restart, the three events happen in sequence.

Key Points

To use a package you have to install and attach it
To use a homemade package, you also have to build it
The build, install and attach process is usually automated by RStudio
There are several ways of installing a package
The best way of installing packages is dependent on the developer and user needs

Content from Getting started

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Overview

Questions

“I want to write a package. Where should I start?”

Objectives

“Create a minimal package”

What does a package look like?

The minimal folder structure of a package looks like this

.
├── R
│   └── <R functions>
├── README.md
├── LICENSE
├── DESCRIPTION
└── NAMESPACE

where:

The folder R contains all the R code (more on this in Writing our own functions).
The README.md file contains human-readable information about the package (more on this in the Documentation episode).
The LICENSE contains information about who and how can use this package (more below).
The DESCRIPTION file contains information about the package itself (more information in the episode on Dependencies).
The NAMESPACE file is automatically generated and tells R which functions can be accessed (more in the Documentation episode).

A minimal package

The menus in RStudio will help us in creating the most minimal of packages. Let’s open RStudio and look at the upper left corner. We will press File > New project > New directory, and see a menu like this:

As you can guess, we will now press R package. The new menu asks us to fill in some information. For the moment, bear with me and fill in the following:

Notice that:

We gave the package a name: mysterycoffee.
I created my package on my ~/Desktop folder, but you can use another location if you prefer.
We left Create git repository unticked. If you want to know more about git, please refer to our courses on Version control. Integrating packages with Git is very useful, but we will not talk about it in this lesson.
We left Use renv with this project unticked.
We ticked Open in new session.

Now we are ready to press Create Project.

What just happened?

After pressing Create Project, a new RStudio window should have appeared. The working folder should be mysterycoffee, and it should already have some contents:

Also, the file ./R/hello.R would appear open in the editor. This is an example file that contains a toy function. Its only functionality is to, well, to say “hello”. This may sound silly, but it will help you writing your first packaged R functions.

The `hello.R` file

Let’s take a look at the hello.R file. You’ll see that it contains a tiny function and some comments. The comments are actually more important than the function itself. They contain very useful tips about how to install, check and test the package.

As a rule of thumb: always read the contents of the example files RStudio creates for you.

Play with the package

Believe it or not, this package is ready to be installed. Just go to the upper right corner and press Build > Install and Restart (or, in newer versions of RStudio, press Build > Install > Clean and install).

This will install and attach the package. The package contains only one function so far: hello().

Try out the `hello()` function. Edit it, and reload the package.

What does it print?
Change this function to generate a different output. (Have fun with it, perhaps add an argument or two!)
Build and install the package, and call the function again to see that it works differently.

Show me the solution

R

mysterycoffee::hello()

OUTPUT

[1] Hello, world!

We can add an argument like this:

R

hello <- function(name) {
   print(paste0("Hello, ", name, "!"))
}

To use the updated function available in RStudio, we can use either

R

devtools::load_all() # then call with hello("Luke")
devtools::install() # then call with mysterycoffee::hello("Luke")

Alternatively, we can also use the graphical user interface as above: Build Install and Restart.

Note: load_all() simulates installing and attaching the package. In larger projects, it allows us to iterate more quickly between changing functions and testing them in the console.

Tell me how you load your functions

There are many ways of using functions, but all of them involve loading them into the workspace. We just learned how to do that using a package.

How do you usually work with functions? Perhaps you source them from an external file? Do you usually work on a single, long script?

Can you think of any advantage of using packages instead? Don’t worry if the answer is no. This is actually a difficult question at this stage. We’ll show the full power of packages along the course.

More advanced folder structures

In this course we will show you how to unleash the full power of packaging. In order to do so, we will use some optional folders. You can see an overview below

.
├── R
│   └── <R functions>
├── data (optional)
│   └── <data>
├── tests (optional)
│   ├── testthat.R
│   └── testthat
│       └── <tests>
├── vignettes (optional)
│   └── <Rmd vignettes>
├── inst (optional)
│   └── <any other files>
├── README.md
├── LICENSE
├── DESCRIPTION
└── NAMESPACE

where:

The data folder contains, as the name suggests, data (more in the Data episode).
The tests folder contains unit tests, that will be very useful for making our package robust and mantainable (more in the episode on Testing).
The vignettes folder contains documentation in Rmd format. As we’ll see, this is a very suitable format for your reports and publications (more in the Vignette episode).
The inst folder contains any extra file you may want to include (more in the Data episode).

Key Points

“A package is no more and no less than a folder structure”
“RStudio can help you”

Content from Writing our own functions

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Overview

Questions

“How can I add functionality to my package?”

Objectives

“Create a custom package”

So far, we have been playing with the example package that is built-in in RStudio. It only contains a function that says Hello, world!. It is extremely useful that we have an example that gets us started, but this package is not very interesting yet. In this and the next episodes, we will create our own customized package, which in the previous episode we gave the name of mysterycoffee.

`mysterycoffee`, our virtual coffee room

Our package will try to mitigate a practical problem: social isolation in remote working environments. We want to create a software solution that simulates random encounters at the office’s coffee machine… when there is no office. The very first step is to answer three very important questions:

1. What will our package do?

As we said, our package will simulate random encounters between employees.

2. How will we do it?

After some thinking, we figured out that we can have a function that has the following input and output:

Input: vector of employees’ names.
Output: a two-column matrix, randomly grouping the employees’ names into couples.

The output table can be published, say, weekly, and each couple invited to have a videoconference-coffee chat, just as if they had randomly met at the coffee machine.

So this will be our starting point. In the next sections we’ll write an R function that does exactly this.

Later on, we’ll see that our original design may face unexpected challenges. For instance, what happens if the number of employees not even?

3. Are we reinventing the wheel?

This is also an important question worth investing some time in when creating new functions or packages. Can we solve our problem with a software solution that someone else already wrote?

Well… if our problem really was to simulate random encounters, the answer is yes. There are already solutions for this. But our real problem is learning how to make R Packages, isn’t it? So we’ll use this problem as a pedagogical example.

Getting our hands dirty

First step: remove `hello.R`

The next step is to remove the file hello.R. This was just an example file, and we don’t need it anymore.

Second step: edit `DESCRIPTION`

Now that we know what our package is expected to do, it is a perfect moment to edit the DESCRIPTION file.

The `DESCRIPTION` file

Open the DESCRIPTION file. What do you see here?

Take 5 minutes to edit this file with the information it asks. In particular, edit the following fields (when needed): Title, Version, Author, Maintainer, Description. For now, ignore the rest.

Show me the solution

After editing, your DESCRIPTION file should look similar to:

TXT

Package: mysterycoffee
Type: Package
Title: Simulation of random encounters between couples of persons
Version: 0.1.0
Author: Pablo Rodriguez-Sanchez
Maintainer: Pablo Rodriguez-Sanchez <p.rodriguez-sanchez@esciencecenter.nl
Description: Simulates random encounters between couples of persons
    This package was inspired by the need to mitigate social isolation in remote 
    working environments. The idea is to simulate random encounters at the office's
    coffee machine... when there is no such an office.
License: What license is it under?
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
RoxygenNote: 7.1.1

More on `DESCRIPTION`

In the previous exercise we deliberately ignored some of the fields in the DESCRIPTION file. Two of them are particularly relevant, the Version and the License fields.

The Version field helps you and your users keep track of the package version. It is advisable to use semantic versioning. In a nutshell, semantic versioning means using a MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH structure for naming your versions. If your new version only fixes some bugs, increase the PATCH by one. If your new version includes new features, increase the MINOR by one. If your new version includes new features that are not backwards compatible, increase MAJOR by one.

Regarding the License: software licensing is a large and complicated field which lies at the intersection of programming and law. Its intricacies are far beyond the aim of this course. The good news is that, most likely, most of your research code can be released under a permissive license, typically MIT or Apache. If you want to know more, please take a look at these materials.

For more, detailed information about DESCRIPTION files, see R Packages documentation.

Third step: create a function

We came up with the following prototype function that will do the random grouping:

R

make_groups <- function(names) {
  # Shuffle the names
  names_shuffled <- sample(names)

  # Arrange it as a two-columns matrix
  names_coupled <- matrix(names_shuffled, ncol = 2)

  return(names_coupled)
}

Please, open an editor, copy the function above and save it as R/functions.R. All the functions of the package have to be in R files inside the R/ folder.

On the art of being tidy

So far, our package only has one function, and we have chosen a very boring name for the file where it is stored (R/functions.R).

In the future, keep in mind that you can use any valid filename for storing your functions. Additionally, such a file can contain one or many functions, and you can use multiple files if you want. Indeed, using multiple files with descriptive filenames is a good idea.

For instance, if your package has some functions for doing input, output and parsing of data, it could be a good idea to store those as R/io.R. You can later put your analysis functions in R/analysis.R, and the plotting ones under R/plotting.R.

Be creative and informative! The only rule is that your .R files should “live” inside the R/ folder.

Key Points

“It is important to think about what we want our package to do (design) and how will it do it (implementation). We also want to know why we need a new package (avoid reinventing the wheel)”
“Functions have to be saved in .R files in the R folder”

Content from Licenses

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 25 minutes

Overview

Questions

How do I allow the use of my package?

Objectives

Understand the reason for licenses
Learn how to add a license to a new R package

What is a license?

In a license, you specify how your code may be used. Everything you create has copyright, which limits the possibility for others to (re)use it. A copyright holder therefore has to explicitly give permission (and specify limitations) for the use of their work. You do this by attaching a license.

Who has copyright?

If you code in your own time for a project only you contribute to, then you are the copyright holder. When a project is authored by multiple people, all of these people have copyright, and therefore need to agree on the license.

When a project is done under employment, the copyright situation becomes more difficult. In most cases, copyright officially belongs to the employer, although the exact situation can differ depending on the employment contract. It is good practice therefore to check whether your employer has a policy for software licensing.

In practice, it is often the case that (university) employees assume copyright of their own work, and in the absence of (open source) policy, decide on their own licenses. Being thorough and checking with the University’s legal department may result in an overly cautious response that requires the use of a proprietary license, heavily limiting the options for your package’s (re)use.

What types of licenses exist?

Many (many!) different options exist for licensing your software. In the spirit of R (licensed under GPL) and the Carpentries (licensed under CC-BY), we will focus on open source licenses. These are licenses that allow the use of the source code. You will meet these licenses in community-built software projects, like R itself.

Two important flavours of open source software licenses are: permissive and copyleft (also known as viral).

Copyleft licenses require that any product that uses the licensed work must be licensed in the same way. That is why it is called a viral license: it spreads. A well-known copyleft software license is the GPL, the GNU Public License. R itself, as mentioned, is licensed under GPL.

Permissive licenses are similarly open, but they do not restrict the way in which downstream work is licensed. A few well known permissive licenses are the MIT license, the Apache license, and the BSD license. They differ in small respects, but their philosophy is the same.

How do I decide what license to use?

First, ask yourself a few important questions:

Is there code you use in your project which is already licensed?
- If so, what are their requirements?
Is there an official policy from my employer that informs my license choice?

Then, head to choosealicense.com, and choose a license. Make sure that all copyright holders for your package agree with your choice.

Copyleft and dependencies in R

R is licensed with the copyleft license GPL. Does this mean that every package in R requires a GPL license? Fortunately, the answer is no. The GPL license is not that strict.

Because of the way the R language works, you are not required to license your R package with GPL. This is also the case when other libraries that your package imports (your so-called dependencies) are GPL licensed: you are not shipping that code directly with your package, so, you are not required to adhere to the copyleft policy.

However, if you copy code from another project and paste it to yours, then that project’s license does become relevant. Be sure to consult it when choosing a license for your own work.

How do I add a license to my R package?

It is easy to apply your license using the usethis package.

R

usethis::use_apache_license()

Two files are edited with this command: - DESCRIPTION - license.MD

Adding and changing the license of the package

Using the usethis package, apply an Apache license to your package. For help, see this link.
In the root directory of your project, which files have changed? How have they changed?
Change the license of your package to the license you want to use. Which function did you use?

Show me the solution

We can use
R
```
usethis::use_apache_license()
```
The function usethis::use_apache_license() edits two files. The full text in LICENSE.md changed. And the used license reported in DESCRIPTION.md changed.

Key Points

A license is essential to allow the use and reuse of your package.
The copyright holder(s) decide(s) on the license.
It is easy to add an open source license to a new R package.

Content from Testing

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 90 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I know that my package works as expected?

Objectives

Understand why tests are useful
Learn how to create a battery of basic tests
Learn how to run the tests
Learn how not to panic if a test fails
Optional: Learn how to perform a code check

What is the first thing you do after writing a function or another piece of code? Most likely, you try it, and figure out if it works as expected. Right? If the answer is yes, congratulations! You already know the very basics of testing!

The main lesson we’ll get out of this episode is that those tiny tests are extremely valuable. So much, that they deserve more than just being typed on the console and be forgotten forever. Tests deserve to be saved, and even more, rerun often. As we will see now, tests can actually be a built-in part of your package!

Manual tests

Now, let’s take a look at the function we have written. How can we check that it works as expected? One possibility could be trying the function in the console. For instance:

R

library(mysterycoffee)

names <- c("Luke", "Vader", "Leia", "Chewbacca", "Solo", "R2D2")
grouped_names <- make_groups(names)

print(grouped_names)

The output should look similar to this:

OUTPUT

     [,1]    [,2]
[1,] "Luke"  "Chewbacca"
[2,] "Vader" "Solo"
[3,] "Leia"  "R2D2"

From what has been printed to the console, we can tell that everything went fine. And not just that: We are receiving a lot of information just by looking at how the function did its job. For instance, we notice that:

All names appear once and only once.
The names have been randomly reordered.
The function created three pairs of names.
The output is a matrix of strings.

All of this is excellent, but these tests pose a practical problem: if we test by looking at the output of the function, someone has to be there to check it went fine. Is there a way of avoiding this? The answer is yes. We can use automated tests to do this for us.

Automated tests

Automated tests are tiny scripts that do exactly what we just did: check that everything is fine. In R packages, R tests are expected to live inside the tests/testthat/ folder. The easiest way to start writing tests is by asking the usethis package to create the folder structure for us:

R

usethis::use_testthat()

What happened?

Take a look at the output of usethis::use_testthat(). Take also a look at your folder system (press the refresh button if needed).

What happened?

Show me the solution

The command above took care of all the folder structure regarding tests. It also printed some useful information on the console:

✓ Setting active project to '~/mysterycoffee'
✓ Adding 'testthat' to Suggests field in DESCRIPTION
✓ Setting Config/testthat/edition field in DESCRIPTION to '3'
✓ Creating 'tests/testthat/'
✓ Writing 'tests/testthat.R'
• Call `use_test()` to initialize a basic test file and open it for editing.

It also created a file called tests/testthat.R. This a system file that rarely has to be manually edited.

Why are we not attaching `usethis`?

In the example above, we used:

R

usethis::use_testthat() # Recommended

but we could have also used:

R

library(usethis)
use_testthat() # Correct, but not recommended

Do you have any idea why? Are the two code snippets above not equivalent?

Show me the solution

When we are developing a package, we’d like to keep our working space as clean and isolated as possible. The first, recommended snippet, is bringing exactly one function from the usethis package to our environment. The second one, on the contrary, is bringing each and every function contained in usethis to our environment.

Our first test

Let’s follow the advice printed in the console and invoke the use_test() function:

R

usethis::use_test('functions')

Once again, very useful information will be printed in the console:

OUTPUT

✓ Writing 'tests/testthat/test-functions.R'
• Modify 'tests/testthat/test-functions.R'

Use smrt names

usethis::use_test(<name>) will generate the test file tests/testthat/test-<name>.R. Our functions live in a file called functions.R, so choosing functions as the name for the tests file is a good idea.

Callout

Don’t forget that projects may grow, and in the future perhaps you’ll have several files containing different functions (for instance, one containing the input/output functions, another containing functions used for analysis and a last one containing the plotting ones). In such a situation, it will be advisable to have three test files, each of them with the corresponding name.

Automated tests are very similar to testing directly in the console, but differ in a crucial aspect: they need to contain assertions. An assertion is a line of code that, typically, warns us if a function behaves in an unexpected manner. You could say that the assertions take the place of the observer, and check that the function is behaving in the expected way. Most assertions are contained in the testthat package, and have names starting by expect_, such as expect_equal, expect_true, and so on.

Write your own test

Let’s follow the advice printed in the console and modify the file tests/testthat/test-functions.R. In order to do this, we first have to open it and take a look at its contents. It should contain something like this:

R

test_that("multiplication works", {
  expect_equal(2 * 2, 42)
})

This is just an example test, that was created to make your life easier. You can use it as a template for writing your own tests. Take 10 minutes to: 1. Figure out what is happening inside this test. Can you understand it? 2. Write another test, just below this one, that checks that addition also works. Tip: you can copy-paste and edit the current test.

Show me the solution

The first argument to test_that is simply the name of your test, that you choose. Beyond that, the test is checking that 2 times 2 equals 4. This may sound silly, but actually something quite interesting is happening. The test checks that the * operator in R works and your human interpretation of multiplication are aligned.

Regarding the test for addition, a possible solution would be:

R

test_that("multiplication works", {
  expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
})

test_that("addition works", {
  expect_equal(2 + 3, 5)
})

Expectations vs results

Notice that the assertions, also known in R as expect functions often look like:

R

expect_equal(<actual result>, <expected result>)

Where the actual result is obtained using software, and the expected result is provided via expert knowledge.

Other common expect functions are:

R

expect_true(<statement we expect to be true>)
expect_false(<statement we expect to be false>)
expect_error(<code we expect to fail>)

Please refer to testthat documentation for a thorough list of expect functions.

A real test

So, we just used tests to convince ourselves that R can multiply and add numbers. But this was not our original goal. What we would like to do is to write an automated test that checks that our function make_groups works as expected. In order to do this, it will be useful to create a new testing file:

R

usethis::use_test('make_groups')

This will create a test file in tests/testthat/test-make_groups.R. It will contain an example test that we can delete.

What can we test now? For instance, the test below will check that the number of elements in the output equals 6:

R

test_that("number of elements", {
  names <- c("Luke", "Vader", "Leia", "Chewbacca", "Solo", "R2D2")
  grouped_names <- make_groups(names)

  expect_equal(length(grouped_names), 6)
})

Automated vs manual testing

Take a look at the test above, and compare it to the manual test we did at the beginning of this episode. What differences do you see?

Show me the solution

There are two main differences.

One is small: we don’t have to attach the library. The file tests/testthat.R takes care of this automatically for us.

The other is more important: we are not checking by looking at the result. Instead, we have to write down an assertion. In our case, we instruct R to expect that the number of elements of our ouput should be 6. (Remember the structure expect_equal(<actual result>, <expected result>))

Test shape

Now it is your turn to write a test. Using the same input as in the previous examples, I want you to check that the output is a matrix with 3 rows and 2 columns.

Tip 1: tests can contain multiple assertions.

Tip 2: the functions nrow and ncol may come in handy.

Show me the solution

The new test should look similar to:

R

test_that("shape", {
  names <- c("Luke", "Vader", "Leia", "Chewbacca", "Solo", "R2D2")
  grouped_names <- make_groups(names)

  expect_equal(nrow(grouped_names), 3)
  expect_equal(ncol(grouped_names), 2)
})

Running the tests

The tests can be run from the build tab, usually located in the upper right corner. Just press More Test package. The menu will also show you the hotkey, typically Ctrl / Cmd + Alt + T.

After the tests are performed, a handy summary table will be displayed:

OUTPUT

==devtools::test()

ℹ Loading mysterycoffee
ℹ Testing mysterycoffee
✓ |  OK F W S | Context
✓ |   2       | functions
✓ |   3       | make_groups

══ Results ══════════════════════════════════════════════════
[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 5 ]

Nice code.

The table above tells us that all the three tests passed successfully.

Test coverage

Test coverage is an indirect method to assess the quality of your package: As a rule of thumb, the higher the test coverage, the more you can be confident that your package is working as expected. It works by measuring the amount of lines of code in your package that have been tested by your test set. For example, let’s say that we have written 100 lines of code. The number of lines executed via our tests is 30, then my test coverage is 30%:

R

(30 / 100) * 100

You can measure automatically your test coverage by using the covr package via its report() function.

R

library(covr)
report()

report() provides a nice table summarising the coverage of the functions in your package.

Why measuring tests’ coverage?

Having an idea of how many lines of code you have effectively tested can help you identify what conditions, decision points (i.e., if/else scenario) and thus portions of the code you may have left out from your tests, perhaps because you haven’t thought about it.

For more information about how covr works:

R

vignette("how_it_works", package = "covr")

What to do if a test fails?

When writing tests, you are allowed to think a bit evil. Actually, you are encouraged to. It is a good idea to think of the many ways the package may fail, and try them.

I think I figured out one: what if we want to use make_groups with an uneven number of names? Let’s write a test for testing that.

Uneven mysterycoffee

Write new a test that passes an uneven number of names to make_groups.

You can use our previous test, the one we called “number of elements”, as a template, and adapt it to accept a list with one more name. This should be a new, additional test, so please copypaste it, don’t delete it.

Run the tests again. What happened?

Show me the solution

We can add a seventh, annoying and troublemaking character, to our list. The test will look as below. Note that we gave this test a descriptive name of what we are testing: “uneven number of elements”.

R

test_that("uneven number of elements", {
 names <- c("Luke", "Vader", "Leia", "Chewbacca", "Solo", "R2D2", "Jar Jar Binks")
 grouped_names <- make_groups(names)

 expect_equal(length(grouped_names), 7)
})

After we run the test, we get an ugly message:

OUTPUT

ℹ Loading mysterycoffee
ℹ Testing mysterycoffee
✓ |  OK F W S | Context
✓ |   2       | functions
✓ |   3   1   | make_groups
───────────────────────────────────────────
Warning (test-make_groups.R:18:3): uneven number of elements
data length [7] is not a sub-multiple or multiple of the number of rows [4]
Backtrace:
 1. mysterycoffee::make_groups(names) test-make_groups.R:18:2
 2. base::matrix(names_shuffled, ncol = 2) ./R/mysterycoffee/R/functions.R:16:2
───────────────────────────────────────────
>
══ Results ════════════════════════════════
[ FAIL 0 | WARN 1 | SKIP 0 | PASS 5 ]

Don’t let the ugliness of the panel intimidate you. As usual, we have a lot of high-quality information here.

To begin with, we got a warning and not an error. This means that the code ran, but it may not behave as expected.

Additionally, we get a human-readable description of what went wrong: the length of the data is 7, and that’s not a sub-multiple of the number of rows, which is 4.

It even gives us a backtrace, that points to the exact files and lines in those files where something went wrong.

What shall we do now?

So, thanks to our test, we discovered a possible problem in our function. What shall we do now?

There are several possibilities. We can leave the function just as it is, and modify the test to assert that a warning is thrown. We can forbid the user to introduce any number that is not even, and throw an error otherwise. Maybe we can come up with an improved function that fixes this.

All of them are reasonable possibilities. Just keep one thing in mind: whatever change we make, it ideally shouldn’t affect the tests that we already wrote!

What would be your preferred solution?

What are tests good for?

In this episode we learned how to create, store and run automated tests. But an even more important question is: why do we want tests for? Let’s reflect for five minutes about this relevant topic.

What is the added value of automated testing?

Storing tests in the form of a script takes a bit more time and effort than just running them interactively in the console.

Do you have any idea about why is it worth the effort?

Show me the solution

There are several reasons why storing your tests is a good idea. Some of them are:

Code is alive. What works today may fail tomorrow. Keeping the tests will help us identifying future failures.
Tests can be used as supporting documentation. As we’ll see soon, tests are often use examples. This can be very valuable for users.
Your tests can be run by a colleague. For instance, in a different computer. If some installation or dependency problem appears, the tests will help discovering it.

Some caveats

Testing plotting functions

Very often, research packages contain plotting functions. The way to manually check that these functions work correctly is, usually, to create the plots and look at them. But this cannot be considered automated testing!

There are, nevertheles, a few things that you can test on a plotting function. For instance, you can check that it doesn’t crash. Or that it produces a plot object… even if nobody checks if it looks nice.

Checking (optional)

Also in the build tab there is a button with the text Check on it.

This button can be understood as an extended version of testing. When pressed, several things will happen:

It will attach the package.
It will check that all dependencies are installed.
It will check that the documentation can be generated.
It will perform the tests.
And most importantly, it will show an error with a descriptive message if something failed.

Let’s check!

Press check, and discuss what happens.

Do not worry at all if you get some warnings and errors. Actually, most likely you’ll get some. And we’ll explain you why that is good news.

Checking vs testing

When we check we perform the tests, and much more. In that sense, we can say that checking is better than testing. Why would you want to test instead? When would you test, and when would you check?

Show me the solution

Checking is usually significantly slower than testing. For small changes in the code, it is usually a good idea to test. For larger changes, or an accumulation of several small ones, it is a good idea to check.

Rule of thumb: test often, check every now and then.

Key Points

Tests help you write a reliable package
A failing test provides a lot of valuable information
Checking goes deeper than testing

Content from Managing dependencies

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 20 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I make my package as easy to install as possible?

Objectives

Use the DESCRIPTION file for declaring dependencies

What are dependencies?

Very often, our own code uses functions from a different package. For instance, we used some functions from the package testthat in our episode about testing. When that’s the case, we need the potential users of our package to, at least, have those other packages also installed in their machines. The, so to say, sub-packages, are the dependencies of our package.

Providing a list of dependencies will greatly simplify the task of installing our package. And the DESCRIPTION file provides a simple and handy way of creating this list.

Using the `DESCRIPTION` file

At this moment, our DESCRIPTION file should look approximately like this:

TXT

Package: mysterycoffee
Type: Package
Title: Simulation of random encounters between couples of persons
Version: 0.1.0
Author: Pablo Rodriguez-Sanchez
Maintainer: Pablo Rodriguez-Sanchez <p.rodriguez-sanchez@esciencecenter.nl>
Description: Simulates random encounters between couples of persons
    This package was inspired by the need to mitigate social isolation in remote
    working environments. The idea is to simulate random encounters at the office's
    coffee machine... when there is no such an office.
License: What license is it under?
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
RoxygenNote: 7.1.1
Suggests:
    testthat (>= 3.0.0)

The most important keywords to declare dependencies are:

Suggests: for recommended dependencies, such as the ones required for testing, creating vignettes (see this episode) or plotting.
Imports: for mandatory dependencies, that is, required for the basic functionality of the package.

As we can see in our DESCRIPTION file, the last two lines already contain a dependency statement. Under the category Suggests we can see the package testthat. More specifically, we can see that a version equal or higher than 3.0.0 is suggested.

What do you mean mandatory?

Please note that, even if we tag a dependency as mandatory using the Imports key, it will never be automatically installed by our new package. We have to do install it ourselves. What is then the use of tagging it as mandatory? That now our package is aware that the dependency should be installed, and it is going to throw an error if that’s not the case.

Add some dependencies

Let’s add some dependencies to this list. Particularly, we want you to add:

knitr as an mandatory dependency.
tidyr as a recommended dependency.

Give me a hint

Tip: take a look at the help menu of usethis::use_package().

Show me the solution

We can add the new dependencies by:

usethis::use_package("knitr", type = "Imports")
usethis::use_package("tidyr", type = "Suggests")

Please notice how the DESCRIPTION file changed:

TXT

Suggests:
  tidyr,
  testthat (>= 3.0.0)
Imports:
  knitr

If you prefer, you can also add the dependencies by directly editing the DESCRIPTION file. But using usethis::use_package() is handy!

Running `devtools::check()`

devtools::check() checks for many different things, but here we want to see it in action for dependencies.

Let’s start by adding a function that depends on another package. We use usethis::use_r() to initiate a file for this function:

R

usethis::use_r("make_groups_and_time")

Then add the following function to the file make_groups_and_time.R:

R

#' Make groups of 2 persons and coffee time
#'
#' Randomly arranges a vector of names into a data frame with
#' 3 columns and whatever number of rows is required. The first
#' two columns are the two persons that meet for the coffee; 
#' the last column is the randomly sampled time at which they meet.
#'
#' @param names The vector of names
#'
#' @return A data frame with re-arranged names in groups and assigned coffee time.
#' @export
#'
make_groups_and_time <- function(names) {
  groups <- data.frame(make_groups(names))
  names(groups) <- c("person1", "person2")
  possible_times <- c("09:30", "10:00", "15:15", "15:45")
  groups_and_time <- dplyr::mutate(
    groups,
    coffee_time = sample(possible_times, 
                         size = nrow(groups), 
                         replace = TRUE)
  )
  return(groups_and_time)
}

Challenge

With this in place, or with your own package, do the following. Run devtools::check() (or click [ Build ] > [ Check ]). What messages do you get about dependencies? Optionally, you can address the messages by changing the code, and re-run devtools::check() to see if you were successful.

Show me the solution

From running devtools::check() we get:

OUTPUT

W  checking dependencies in R code ...
 '::' or ':::' import not declared from: ‘dplyr’

We can add the dplyr dependency with usethis::use_package("dplyr", type = "imports"). This updates the DESCRIPTION.

Key Points

The DESCRIPTION file helps us keep track of our package’s dependencies

Content from Documenting your package

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 60 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I make my package understandable and reusable?

Objectives

Write a readme
Use roxygen2 for creating documentation
Use roxygen2 for managing the NAMESPACE file

Why documenting?

Your code is going to be read by people, for instance:

People interested in your research.
Potential users of your code.
Colleagues and collaborators.
Yourself, in the future, after you forgot all the tiny details.

For this and other reasons, it is a very good idea to invest some time in writing good documentation.

The README

The first, and perhaps most important document of any coding project is the readme file. This file typically has the name README.md and is located at the root folder, just at the same level as DESCRIPTION or NAMESPACE.

The readme file provides the very first contact with your code to potential users.

What do you want to tell your potential users?

Try to put yourself in the shoes of your potential users. They can be collaborators, people who found you code on the internet, …

What do you think they would like to know?

Now, take a look at the README from github.com/PabRod/kinematics.

What subjects are addressed in this README? As a potential user, is there anything that you miss?

With the results of this discussion, write a short README file for our package.

Get started with usethis::use_readme_md() to generate a default README.md file.

(Optional) Readme rendering

One of the advantages of having a README.md is that most code repositories render this file as a nicely-formatted reader-friendly text. See, for instance, the “main page” of the kinematics package on GitHub (link). In GitHub, you can even create a readme about yourself!

If you want to know more about GitHub, please take a look at the Software Carpentries’ lesson on Version Control.

Documenting your functions with `roxygen2`

As we saw, the purpose of the readme is to welcome whoever happens to be looking at your project. This means that it is rarely the place for very technical information, such as the one describing the way your functions work. The most practical way of documenting your functions is by integrating the documents as part of the functions. This is exactly what the package roxygen2 helps us with.

roxygen2 is a package that makes writing packages much easier. In particular, roxygen2 takes care of your functions’ documentation. As a bonus, it also takes care of the NAMESPACE file. If you don’t have it installed (you can check by trying library(roxygen2)), please do it now (install.packages("roxygen2")).

Unfortunately, using it requires manually configuring a few things. Please follow these steps:

Using `roxygen2` for the first time

Delete NAMESPACE. roxygen2 will create a new one for you.
Delete the man/ folder. roxygen2 will create a new one for you.
In the upper right panel, go to Build More Configure Build Tools. You’ll see a menu like this:
Tick Generate documentation with Roxygen. A new menu will appear:
Tick Install and restart.

And you are all set!

Let’s create our first roxygen skeleton. You can follow the steps in the animation below. Please note that, before pressing Code > Insert Roxygen skeleton your cursor has to be inside the function’s body.

Let’s take a look at the skeleton. It contains:

A Title section, where you can write what your function does. You can use add more comment lines below for a long description.
The return field refers to the function’s output.
The params field(s) refer to each of the function’s input(s).
The export field means that this function should be exported to the NAMESPACE. We’ll discuss it further later.
The examples field is used, as you can guess, for adding examples to the documentation. We’ll not use it now, so we can delete it. If you are interested in this or other optional parameters, please refer to roxygen2 documentation.

Write the docs

Take 5 minutes to edit the skeleton with real documentation. In particular:

Add a title.
Describe, below the title, what the function does.
Describe the parameter names.
Describe the output that is returned.
Ignore @export.
Delete @examples.

Show me the solution

The documentation should look approximately like this:

R

#' Make groups of 2 persons
#'
#' Randomly arranges a vector of names into a matrix with 2 columns and
#' whatever number of columns is required
#'
#' @param names The vector of names
#'
#' @return The re-arranged matrix of names
#' @export
#'
make_groups <- function(names) {
  # Shuffle the names
  names_shuffled <- sample(names)

  # Arrange it as a two-columns matrix
  names_coupled <- matrix(names, ncol = 2)

  return(names_coupled)

Please note that the documentation is even longer than the code. There is nothing wrong about this, to the contrary. If you have to choose between too few and too much documentation, go for too much without hesitation.

The `export` field

In case you don’t want your function to be directly accessible for users of your package, you just have to delete the @export keyword from the function documentation. But, why would you want that? Can you think of an example where hiding a function can be a good idea?

Show me the solution

Sometimes packages use auxiliary functions that perform intermediate operations. Writing functions for these operations can be very useful for the developer, but confusing for potential users. If that’s the case, it can be a good idea to not export those functions keeping them only internally available.

Now that we have written the documentation, we are ready to build it. As you will see, the process is quite automatic.

Building the documentation

If you configured roxygen2 as we suggested in section “Using roxygen2 for the first time”, the documentation will be generated every time you press “Install and restart” in the “Build” menu at the upper right side of RStudio. The tab will also contain a “Document” only:

Writing the `NAMESPACE`

The documentation build also created the NAMESPACE file. Can you open it and describe what do you see? What does it mean?

Show me the solution

The NAMESPACE file should look like:

TXT

# Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand

export(make_groups)

The export command guarantees that the function make_groups will be available for the final users of the package.

The comment is also worth noting: you don’t have to edit this file by hand; roxygen2 will take care of it.

Reading the documentation

After generating the documentation and installing the package, the documentation generated by roxygen2 can be accessed as usual in R using a question mark and the name of the function we are interested in:

R

?make_groups

The help menu will open and show something like this:

Key Points

Documentation is not optional
All coding projects need a readme file
roxygen2 helps us with the otherwise tedious process of documenting
roxygen2 also takes care of NAMESPACE

Content from Data

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 60 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I include data in my package?

Objectives

Learn how to use the data folder

Packaging data

In some situations, it could be a good idea to include data sets as part of your package. Some packages, indeed, include only data.

Take a look, for instance, at the babynames package. According to the package description, it contains “US baby names provided by the SSA”.

In this chapter we will learn how to include some data in our package. This can be very useful to ship the data together with the package, in an easy to install way.

Is your data too big?

Packages are typically not larger than a few gigabytes.

If you need to deal with large datasets, adding them to the package is not an advisable solution. Instead, consider using Figshare or similar services.

Using R data files

R has its own native data format, the R data file. These files are recognizable by their extensions: .rda or .RData. Using R data files is the simplest approach to data management inside R Packages.

Step 1: let R know that you’ll use data

We can add data to our project by letting the package usethis help us. In the snippet below, we generate some data and then we use usethis to store it as part of the package:

R

example_names <- c("Luke", "Vader", "Leia", "Chewbacca", "Solo", "R2D2")

usethis::use_data(example_names)

What happened?

Type and execute in your console the code we just showed. What does it do? Does it require any further action from our side?

Show me the solution

It provides a very informative output. Probably you’ll see something like this:

OUTPUT

✔ Setting active project to '<working folder>/mysterycoffee'
✔ Saving 'example_names' to 'data/example_names.rda'
• Document your data (see 'https://r-pkgs.org/data.html')

So, what happened is that it created the file example_names.rda inside the data folder. Additionally, it activated the project, but that’s not very relevant because most likely the project was already active.

The last element in the list shows something that didn’t happen: the data documentation. Actually, we are asked to do it ourselves. usethis is kind enough to provide us with a link with further information, in case we need it.

So let’s move to the second (and last) step, and document our data.

Step 2: document your data

Everything you put inside your package needs some documentation. Data is no exception. But, how to document it? The answer is easy: not very differently as did with functions in the documentation episode.

An example documentation string for our data could be:

#' Example names
#'
#' An example data set containing six names from the Star Wars universe
#'
#' @format A vector of strings
#' @source Star Wars
"example_names"

We will save this text in R/example_names.R, and we are ready to go.

Checking that everything went ok

In the build panel, press install and restart. Now, type ?example_names in the console. Do you see some information about the dataset?

Tip: if not, make sure that you activated Generate documentation with Roxygen in the Build/More/Configure build tools tab.

Using raw data

Sometimes you need to use data in formats other than .rda. Examples of this are .csv or .txt files.

In order to store raw data in your package, you have to follow a slightly different procedure. Namely:

Create a folder inst/extdata/, and save files there. Note that a user will have access to these data.
When loading the data, do not describe the path as you usually would. Instead, use something like:

R

filepath <- system.file("extdata", "names.csv", package = "mysterycoffee")
names <- read.csv(filepath)

Discussion

When do you think is it useful for a package to include data that do not have the .rda or .RData extensions?

Show me the solution

Having files without the R extensions is useful when one of the main purposes of the package is to read external files. For instance, the readr package loads rectangular data from files where the values are comma- or tab-separated.

Summary

Data handling inside R packages can be a bit tricky. The diagram below summarizes the most common cases:

Instructor Note

The diagram was created with mermaid. This is the original code:

flowchart LR
    id1(Does the user need access?) --Yes--> id6(Store it in data/)
    id3(Is the data in .Rda format?)--Yes--> id1
    id1 --No, but tests do--> id5(Store it in tests/)
    id1 --No, but functions do--> id4(Store it in R/sysdata.Rda*)
    id3 --No--> id8(But can it be?)
    id8 --Yes, with some work --> id9(Document the process in data-raw/**)
    id8 --No, it shouldn't--> id7(Store it in inst/extdata)

*) R/sysdata.Rda is a file dedicated to (larger) data needed by your functions. Read more about it here.

**) data-raw/ is a folder dedicated to the origin and cleanup of your data. Read more about it here.

If you need further help, please take a look at section 14.3 of the excellent R Packages tutorial by Hadley Wickham.

Key Points

R packages can also include data

Content from Vignettes

Last updated on 2024-11-12 | Edit this page

Estimated time: 60 minutes

Overview

Questions

How can I use R packages to write my research?

Objectives

Learn how to write reports in the form of a vignette

Vignettes

If you are reading this, chances are that you are using R for doing research. And if you are a researcher, probably you spend a lot of time writing. Did you know that you can write your reports, and even your papers, directly from R?

We’ll do this with vignettes. Vignettes are plain-text files that combine enriched text and code. Typically, the enriched text is displayed and the code is hidden and executed.

Think about it for a moment. A vignette will take code from your package, execute it, generate the figures for you, and put everything together and in context. The resulting document would be a human readable website, pdf file or even Microsoft Word file.

Why would you want to do that?!

Writing your reports directly in R Studio may sound like an overkill, and it is certainly a bit harder than writing on an external word processor. Can you think of a couple of reasons for making the effort worth it?

Show me the solution

There are several reasons that make the use of vignettes a very good idea for writing research. For instance: - It keeps all the work tidy in a single project folder. - The document describes and performs the calculations, instead of only describing them. - The document can be read as a text, but interested enough readers can also execute it, test it. In short: reproduce it.

Why is everybody talking about reproducibility?

The Replication crisis has been in the headlines recently. In short, Replication crisis means that the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce in an independent lab (and often even at the same lab they were produced!).

And why is this relevant? Because reproducibility is a cornerstone of the scientific method. It can be argued that non-reproducible results are literally not scientific.

`Rmarkdown` files

In R, vignettes are typically written using .Rmd (a shortening of Rmarkdown) files. The name is self-descriptive: it is a file that combines code (in R) and text (in markdown).

What is markdown?

Markdown is a way of creating formatted text using a plain-text editor. Actually, it looks a lot like plain text, but with some special symbols every now and then indicating aesthetic details such as bold typeface, links, tables, … Markdown files can be rendered to reading-friendly formats, such as html or pdf.

This website is written in markdown. Below you can the source for the last paragraph of the previous section.

MARKDOWN

In `R`, vignettes are typically written using `.Rmd` (a shortening of `Rmarkdown`) files.
The name is self-descriptive: it is a file that combines **code** (in `R`) and **text** (in `markdown`).

The good news is you don’t have to learn by hearth all these symbols. As we’ll see below, RStudio is going to help you a lot in this regard. Additionally, there are lots of good cheat sheets available online.

We can easily create our first vignette using the RStudio menus. Click on File/New file/R Markdown, and you’ll see a window like the one below:

Fill in the field Title with the text: “Examples of usage”, and press OK.

A new file will appear. Before going further, let’s save it. Create a folder inside your project with the name vignettes, and save it there with the name examples.Rmd.

Now, let’s take a look at the file. Notice that the new file is not empty. This is great! RStudio created an example for us!

As always, it is instructive to read the message (in this case, the file) that RStudio generated for us. We realize that:

Several formatting options are present as examples (so we don’t have to remember them!).
Code blocks are surrounded by the symbol ```{r <name>, <optional parameters>} and end with ```.
There is something called knit that seems to be important.

“Knitting” is the process of generating a reader-friendly document. And RStudio has a button for that. Let’s press it and see what happens.

Great, isn’t it?

Can I knit markdown files to other formats than html?

Yes, and surprisingly easy indeed. Just take a look a the expanded menu of the knitting button.

Be warned, anyways, that some output formats may require installing additional packages.

Can I use vignettes with other language than R?

Yes, although this is advanced material that we’ll not cover in detail in this course.

Our vignette

The template vignette we just created works fine, but it doesn’t give any useful information about our package. In this section we’ll fix that. We will create a report including some examples to show how great our package is!

A vignette about `mysterycoffee`

Open the default vignette we created in the previous section. Use it as a template (for instance, editing and removing parts of it) to turn it into a vignette about mysterycoffee, the package we created during this course.

What can you write? Just let me give you a few suggestions:

What about beginning with a tiny introduction section? If you don’t feel creative, you can write something along the lines of: “Working from home can be boring. Luckily, mysterycoffee is here to help”.

Now, a how to use it section will be ideal. It will require some code chunks: A chunk to attach the package, a chunk to load some names and a chunk to make the groups. Don’t forget to insert explanatory text in between the chunks.

We may also need a chunk to actually display the groups formed after knitting.

Show me the solution

This is what I wrote. Of course, your text, and even your code, will most likely be different.

MARKDOWN

---
title: "Example of usage"
author: "Pablo Rodriguez"
date: "12/8/2021"
output: html_document
---
## Introduction

Working from home can be lonely. Do you miss the random chats at the coffee machine? Certainly we do!

Luckily, our R package `mysterycoffee` is here to help.

## How to use it

Well, first you'll have to attach the package.

```{r install}
# library(mysterycoffee) # uncomment this line in the vignette
```

Afterwards, the package will need the names of your colleagues. These are mine:

```{r names}
names <- c("Pablo Rodríguez",
           "Lieke de Boer",
           "Barbara Vreede",
           "President Obama",
           "General Sun Tzu",
           "Pharaoh Hatshepsut")
```

Now we just have to use the function `make_groups` to assign the random coffee partners:

```{r assign}
groups <- make_groups(names)
```

And here you have the result!

```{r print, echo=FALSE}
print(groups)
```

Instructor Note

In the solution above, the line library(mysterycoffee) is commented out. This is a technical choice: due to the Carpentries Lesson Template being written in Rmarkdown, this line caused the CI to attempt to install mysterycoffee… which of course does not exist. Please make sure to point out when sharing this solution that the line must be uncommented in a functional vignette.

Hiding chunks

Sometimes you don’t want the content of the code chunk to be printed in the knitted document, but only its results. How can you control this?

Hint: take a look at the menu that appears at the right upper corner of each chunk.

Show me the solution

The menu in the upper corner of each chunk allows you to do multiple things. Among them, it allows you to fine-control what will happen to every chunk. You can comfortably choose among a combination of execute or not execute the chunk, display the code, the output, or nothing.

By the way, did you notice the effect of choosing one of these options in the file itself? When you choose, for instance, show output only, the parameter echo=FALSE will be added to the chunk header.

Key Points

Reports can be part of the package

Overview

Questions

Objectives

What is a package and what is it good for?

A thought about standards

How can this course help me?

Prerequisites

Why R?

Why RStudio?

Pro-tip

Key Points

Overview

Questions

Objectives

Install a package from CRAN

The same, but with a command

R

Something went wrong?

Can I publish my package in CRAN?

Using an installed package

What if we want to attach a package from the console?

Show me the solution

Using a function without attaching the package

R

To attach or not to attach?

Show me the solution

Install a package from GitHub

Find a package on github, bitbucket, or gitlab and install it with devtools

Show me the solution

Why would you want to install a package from GitHub?

Show me the solution

Install a package from source

Why would you want to load a package from source

Show me the solution

A short glossary

Key Points

Overview

Questions

Objectives

What does a package look like?

A minimal package

What just happened?

The hello.R file

Play with the package

Try out the hello() function. Edit it, and reload the package.

Show me the solution

R

OUTPUT

R

R

Tell me how you load your functions

More advanced folder structures

Key Points

Overview

Questions

Objectives

mysterycoffee, our virtual coffee room

1. What will our package do?

2. How will we do it?

3. Are we reinventing the wheel?

Getting our hands dirty

First step: remove hello.R

Second step: edit DESCRIPTION

The DESCRIPTION file

Show me the solution

TXT

More on DESCRIPTION

Third step: create a function

R

On the art of being tidy

Key Points

Overview

Questions

Objectives

What is a license?

Who has copyright?

What types of licenses exist?

How do I decide what license to use?

Copyleft and dependencies in R

How do I add a license to my R package?

The `hello.R` file

Try out the `hello()` function. Edit it, and reload the package.

`mysterycoffee`, our virtual coffee room

First step: remove `hello.R`

Second step: edit `DESCRIPTION`

The `DESCRIPTION` file

More on `DESCRIPTION`

Why are we not attaching `usethis`?

Using the `DESCRIPTION` file