Software dependencies
Last updated on 2024-12-03 | Edit this page
Overview
Questions
- How can we communicate different versions of software dependencies?
Objectives
- Know how to track dependencies of a project
- Set up an environment and make sure others can reproduce your environment
Our codes often depend on other codes that in turn depend on other codes …
- Reproducibility: We can version-control our code with Git but how should we version-control dependencies? How can we capture and communicate dependencies?
- Dependency hell: Different codes on the same environment can have conflicting dependencies.
Kitchen analogy
- Software <-> recipe
- Data <-> ingredients
- Libraries <-> pots/tools
Tools and what problems they try to solve
Conda, Anaconda, pip, virtualenv, Pipenv, pyenv, Poetry, requirements.txt, environment.yml, renv, …, these tools try to solve the following problems:
- Defining a specific set of dependencies, possibly with well defined versions
- Installing those dependencies mostly automatically
- Recording the versions for all dependencies
-
Isolate environments
- On your computer for projects so they can use different software
- Isolate environments on computers with many users (and allow self-installations)
- Using different Python/R versions per project
- Provide tools and services to share packages
Isolated environments are also useful because they help you make sure that you know your dependencies!
If things go wrong, you can delete and re-create - much better than debugging. The more often you re-create your environment, the more reproducible it is.
Dependencies-1: Time-capsule of dependencies
Situation: 5 students (A, B, C, D, E) wrote a code that depends on a couple of libraries. They uploaded their projects to GitHub. We now travel 3 years into the future and find their GitHub repositories and try to re-run their code before adapting it.
Answer in the collaborative document:
- Which version do you expect to be easiest to re-run? Why?
- What problems do you anticipate in each solution?
A: It will be tedious to collect the dependencies one by one. And after the tedious process you will still not know which versions they have used.
B: If there is no standard file to look for and look at and it might become very difficult for to create the software environment required to run the software. But at least we know the list of libraries. But we don’t know the versions.
C: Having a standard file listing dependencies is definitely better than nothing. However, if the versions are not specified, you or someone else might run into problems with dependencies, deprecated features, changes in package APIs, etc.
D and E: In both these cases exact versions of all dependencies are specified and one can recreate the software environment required for the project. One problem with the dependencies that come from GitHub is that they might have disappeared (what if their authors deleted these repositories?).
E is slightly preferable because version numbers are easier to understand than Git commit hashes or Git tags.
Dependencies-2: Create a time-capsule for the future
Now we will demo creating our own time-capsule and share it with the future world. If we asked you now which dependencies your project is using, what would you answer? How would you find out? And how would you communicate this information?
Uploading your requirements.txt or renv files to GitHub
Follow these steps to add the files in which you recorded your dependencies to GitHub:
This episode is based on the Code Refinery Reproducible Research lesson about dependencies.
Key Points
- Recording dependencies with versions can make it easier for the next person to execute your code
- There are many tools to record dependencies